Digesting the Medical Past
A history of medicine blog about the history of diet, nutrition, stomachs and digestion.
By Ian Miller, University College Dublin.
Digesting the Medical Past: An Introduction
Historicising
the Stomach
The stomach is an organ of historical significance.
The organ’s past is the subject of my monograph, A Modern History of the Stomach: Gastric Illness, Medicine and British
Society, 1800-1950, published by Pickering and Chatto in 2011.
When I first began immersing myself in this
research, it quickly became apparent that a wealth of previously unexplored material
relating to stomachs and digestion was available in nineteenth- and
twentieth-century medical journals, journalistic commentary, literature and
social commentary as well as the extensive historic collection of medical textbooks
available on the shelves of the Wellcome Library, London. This encouraged me to
write an account of the history of the stomach, and the medical, scientific,
technological and social discourses that historically surrounded the organ and
its illnesses.
The history of gastric illness is important, in
my view, because medical historians have emphasised epidemiological diseases
including tuberculosis and cholera at the expense of chronic complaints that
tended not to kill its victims in the past but certainly caused them years of agonising
pain, disruption to day-to-day life and an inability to work. Gastric illness has
always been class-neutral. Historically, it affected everyone from rich to
poor. This remains the case today. Indeed, at the time of writing, gastric illness
has, in recent weeks, impeded the Queen’s ability to undertake her official duties.
Even Morrissey has been overheard publicly complaining of his inability to pay
for the treatment of a crippling bleeding abdominal ulcer that has forced him
to abandon his ongoing touring commitments. Alongside these high-profile sufferers,
a countless number of individuals endure debilitating episodes of gastric
discomfort.
This
blog is especially interested in recounting the
various historical stories relating to the stomach. Each individual
stomach has
its own story to tell; its own history of health and illness; its
endless cycle
of digesting and processing food; its potential to succumb to illness
and
sickness. Stomachs also have their own historical narrative. Once, the
organ was mysterious and unknown, even to physicians. However, since the
late
eighteenth century, the organ became increasingly subject to
experimental
investigation by dieticians, pathologists, surgeons, gastroenterologists
- even
psychologists - as medicine professionalised throughout the nineteenth
and
twentieth centuries. The plethora of experts who involved themselves in
attempting to understand the organ and its illnesses also share their
own
fascinating histories. I will combine these expert accounts with the
traces of
historical stomach complaints recorded in autobiographies, literature
and other
sources in order to highlight an unusual, but significant, aspect of
modern
health history.
Post-Famine
Food Reform in Ireland
In my second research project, undertaken at University College Dublin,
I have shifted my focus to nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Ireland. While
researching the history of the stomach, I came
across various references to the overly large Irish stomach. Prior to the
Famine (c.1845-52), the dietary customs of the less affluent Irish was heavily
dominated by the potato. Critics of this mono-crop existence, including
prominent physicians James Johnson, lamented that Irish peasants had developed
abnormally large stomachs that impeded their economic performance and produced
such levels of laziness that work was virtually abandoned leaving peasants with
too much time on their hands to procreate and over-populate the country.
Of course, these statements were highly
derogatory – practically racist by today’s standards - but it did lead me to
think that an interesting historically-focused project on Irish diet could be
done. So far, historians of Irish food have analysed the dramatic changes in
dietary customs that followed the Famine by estimating the amount of calories
that were probably ingested in past contexts, or by analysing imports and
exports. As an alternative, I have looked into the socio-cultural meanings
surrounding food in post-Famine Ireland and the debates which surrounded food
in that period.
Rather than starting, as many historians have
done, with the presumption that the Irish population naturally weaned
themselves away from reliance on the potato due to having learnt lessons from
the Famine, I have chosen to investigate a range of medical, scientific and
expert figures and groups who sought to intervene in changing and regulating
what the Irish poor ate. I have also discovered that the rhetoric surrounding post-Famine
dietary conditions often focused upon strengthening Irish bodies as a means of
fostering social improvement and economic productivity.
Hence, the working title of my current project is
Reforming Food in Post-Famine Ireland:
Medicine, Science and Improvement, c.1845-1922. Within it, I explore a wide
range of topics relating to both the history of medicine and science in Ireland.
My future posts will investigate connections
forged between post-Famine Irish tea drinking and insanity, nationalist propaganda
relating to the apparent starving of Irish schoolchildren by the British State
and Sinn Féin’s efforts, during the First World War, to prove that Britain was
deliberately attempting to initiate a second Famine in Ireland.
This blog is intended to communicate my ongoing research findings in the history of digestion, diet and nutrition.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire