The Ischia Summer School
Creating Life: From Alchemy to Synthetic Biology
Date: 29 Jun 2013 09:00
Start date: 29 Jun 2013 09:00
End date: 06 Jul 2013 18:00
Peter Murray Jones
James E. Strick
Helen A. Curry
Directors: Janet Browne (Harvard), Christiane Groeben (Naples), Nick Hopwood (Cambridge), Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter)
Funding: Wellcome Trust, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
Venue: Villa Dohrn, Ischia, Italy
Call for applications
The Thirteenth Ischia Summer School on the History of the Life Sciences
Villa Dohrn, Ischia, Italy
29 June – 6 July 2013
Applications are invited for this week-long summer school, which provides advanced training in history of the life sciences through lectures and seminars in a historically rich and naturally beautiful setting. The theme for 2013 is "Creating Life:
From Alchemy to Synthetic Biology".
This week-long summer school provides advanced training in history of the life sciences, a lively international field that offers a long-term perspective on some of the most significant ideas, practices and institutions in the world today. The event attracts expert faculty and well-qualified students for a combination of lectures, seminar discussion and student presentations in a historically rich and naturally beautiful setting. We aim to encourage exchange of ideas across disciplinary boundaries, national cultures and historical periods. We can accommodate up to 26 graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, and also accept established researchers seeking to enter a new field. The biennial school, which looks back on a distinguished tradition of association with the Stazione Zoologica, was revived in 2005 after a break of some two decades and again ran successfully in 2007, 2009 and 2011. It is held in Villa Dohrn, the current Laboratory for Benthic Ecology and former summer house of the founder Anton Dohrn, situated above the port of the island of Ischia and overlooking the Gulf of Naples.
Introduction to the theme
In May 2010, scientists at the J. Craig Venter Institute announced the creation of the first artificial cell. Although this feat relied on active assistance from existing cells, it raised to public attention contemporary efforts to create life artificially. This development is rather unexpected – only a few years ago, "artificial life" was more associated with computer simulations – and seems to have come about by recent advances in computational power and molecular engineering only. In contrast, earlier tales about human ingressions into the divine domain of creating life, like those of Pygmalion, the Golem or Frankenstein, speak of hubris and retaliation and seem to belong to the realm of fantasy.
This summer school aims to move beyond this perception by uncovering the long-term history of the human production of life and living beings. Past projects of creating life – such as Jacques Loeb’s attempts at "artificial parthenogenesis" around 1900 or the Cold War race to generate life from a primordial soup – have to be seen in a broader context of practices that defined the border between the living and the non-living, and hence what it could mean to produce one from the other. Paying attention to the successes and contestations of such projects will reveal important epistemological, ontological and ethical commitments that have shaped the life sciences historically. By definition transgressive, such projects probe the capacity of the life sciences to standardise, control and manipulate life, provoke discussions about "minimal" definitions of life, and challenge ethical intuitions about the dignity of living beings.
It may seem as though the pre-modern world, with its religious and metaphysical belief in a fixed number of species, must have been especially averse to the possibility of creating life by human means. Two arguments cast doubt on this popular notion: organisms were often considered to be made of the same stuff as the surrounding world, and generation was generally conceived to be a creative act; hence what in hindsight seems to be naïve credulity about the spontaneous generation of organisms from non-living matter – maggots from meat, mice from straw – and the monstrous generation of hybrids between distant species. Alchemy, in particular, modelled its craft on climbing the scale of perfection, and finding the philosopher’s stone, a universal means for the restoration and prolongation of life. Given these pre-modern convictions, was the creation of life indeed beyond the pale of human artifice? Was it really only God who could “ensoul” living beings? How did physicians and their patients view the obvious ability of humans to “make” children? Did horticulturalists and animal breeders think of their craft as subservient to divine powers only, or perhaps as truly creative in one way or other?
Ironically, it was the rise of mechanical metaphors in the early modern period, with its conception of organisms as automata, which turned the processes of generation and reproduction into “nature’s innermost secret” (Buffon). If organisms were machines, they were peculiar machines, because unlike man-made mechanisms they could reproduce themselves. Efforts to understand, and eventually control and manipulate, this reproductive power tackled the problem either by moving down to the level of the elementary units making up living organisms – tissues, cells, and biomolecules – or by moving up to the level of interbreeding and evolving populations. The rhetoric of creating life, however, remained as powerful as ever throughout the modern period, motivated by successes in bringing life to the laboratory, and the laboratory to the field. Experimental animals were kept alive artificially, and isolated body parts, tissues and cells were cultured, while geneticists working on actual populations liked to compare their work with that of synthetic chemists. Industrial culture and urban life increasingly blurred the border between the natural and the artificial, and inspired utopian ideas of total control over life. How important were these motives in defining the agendas of researchers and their funders? Did they translate into concrete research tools and practices? And what opposition did they provoke? Following up these historical questions will add a much needed historical perspective to contemporary debates about synthetic life, by both pointing out that we have in some respects been here before, and providing a clearer picture of how we got where we are.
The organisers will introduce the theme, chair the sessions, and lead discussion sessions. Each faculty member will give a talk of up to 30 minutes, with equal time for discussion, and organize a one-hour seminar discussion. This will provide the lecture experience that some students particularly value plus plenty of opportunities for interaction and participation, which will be enhanced by student presentations and general discussions. English is the working language and readings will be circulated in advance.
Peter Murray Jones, King’s College, Cambridge
Lecture: Generation and Ensoulment from Antiquity to the Middle Ages
Seminar: Visions and Disputations: Medieval Perspectives on Ensoulment
Hiro Hirai, Radboud Universitet, Nijmegen
Lecture: Generation, Reproduction and 'Creation' of Life in Renaissance and Early Modern Medicine, Natural Philosophy and Alchemy
Seminar: Homunculus: Artificial Production of Life in Early Modern Alchemy
Staffan Müller-Wille, University of Exeter
Discussion: Generation and Creation
James E. Strick, Franklin & Marshall
Lecture: Darwin and the Darwinians on the Origin of Life
Seminar: The Oparin-Haldane Paradigm vs Synthetic Life Experiments in the 1930s
Janet Browne, Harvard University
Discussion: Darwinism and the Creativity of Life
Helen A. Curry, University of Cambridge
Lecture: “Evolution to Order”: Plant Breeding and the Production of Novelty
Seminar: Biological Innovation in Science and Law
Luis Campos, University of New Mexico
Lecture: n-1: Minimal Life From Radiobes to Synthia
Seminar: Creating Life in the Twentieth Century
Nick Hopwood, University of Cambridge
Discussion: 'Babies "created" in test tube, scientist claims'
Bernadette Bensaud-Vincent, University Paris I (Sorbonne)
Lecture: Creating New Forms of Life: Synthetic Biology
Seminar: Synthetic Biology
Stefan Helmreich, MIT
Lecture: What Was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies
Seminar: The Definition of Life: Answers from Theoretical Biology
Wolfgang Schäffner, Humboldt University Berlin
Lecture: Urban Life
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin
In addition, there will be a welcoming reception and other social events, and we will take one day for a trip to Naples to visit the main Zoological Station, a major international institution of biology since 1872, to see its historical collections (a great specialist library for history of biology and important archive), laboratories and famous aquarium.
All participants should be present for the full week in order to facilitate discussions. 29 June and 6 July are travelling days, with no lectures or seminars scheduled.
There is a charge for students of 300 Euros each. This will cover hotel accommodation and all meals, but students will need to pay for their own travel to Ischia.
The directors will consider requests to waive the fee from qualified students, especially from developing countries, who are unable to raise the money themselves and whose institutions cannot provide it. These must be supported by a detailed financial statement and a letter from the applicant’s head of institution.
15 February 2013 Deadline for applications
March 2013 Students to be notified of outcome
31 May 2013 Registration fees and/or registration forms due
or by mail to:
Birgitta v. Mallinckrodt
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Applications should include:
1. a brief cv,
2. a statement specifying academic experience and interest in the course topic (max. 300 words),
3. a letter of recommendation.