samedi 5 avril 2025

Poste en histoire des soins intensifs

Research Associate - Life Support: Technologies, Institutions and Experiences in the History of Intensive Care Medicine, 1945-2020


Call for applications



Job reference: BMH-028332
Salary: £37,174 - £45,413 per annum, dependent on relevant experience
Faculty/Organisational Unit: Biology, Medicine Health
Location: Oxford Road
Employment type: Fixed Term
Division/Team: Division of Medical Education
Hours Per Week: Full time (1 FTE)
Closing date (DD/MM/YYYY): 14/04/2025
Contract Duration: Fixed term until 31/05/2026 (subject to extension)
School/Directorate: School of Medical Sciences


We seek to appoint a Research Associate in the Recent and Contemporary History of Medicine to work on a research project on the history of intensive care and intensive care units, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and directed by Professor Flurin Condrau at Zürich and Professor Carsten Timmermann at Manchester. The researcher will be housed at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Faculty of Biology, Health and Medicine, working with Professor Timmermann. The project is funded until 31 August 2028. The post is for the duration of the project, but subject to funding and annual renewals. More information on the post and the project is available in the Further Particulars document, and on request from Professor Timmermann.

The successful candidate will have a commitment to research and publication and to methodological advancement. We welcome applications from doctoral graduates, early career researchers, and others for whom this position is suitable. We encourage candidates to develop their own approaches to the topic, in collaboration with the PIs and other team members.

In the Additional Information section of the application form, please explain how you meet the requirements for the post, including discussion of relevant experience, required and desirable skills.

What you will get in return:Fantastic market leading Pension scheme
Excellent employee health and wellbeing services including an Employee Assistance Programme
Exceptional starting annual leave entitlement, plus bank holidays
Additional paid closure over the Christmas period
Local and national discounts at a range of major retailers

As an equal opportunities employer we support an inclusive working environment and welcome applicants from all sections of the community regardless of age, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender expression, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation and transgender status. All appointments are made on merit.

Our University is positive about flexible working – you can find out more here

Hybrid working arrangements may be considered.

Please note that we are unable to respond to enquiries, accept CVs or applications from Recruitment Agencies.

Any CV’s submitted by a recruitment agency will be considered a gift.

Enquiries about the vacancy, shortlisting and interviews:

Name: Professor Carsten Timmermann
Email: carsten.timmermann@manchester.ac.uk

General enquiries:
Email: People.recruitment@manchester.ac.uk

Technical support:
https://jobseekersupport.jobtrain.co.uk/support/home

This vacancy will close for applications at midnight on the closing date.

Please see the link below for the Further Particulars document which contains the person specification criteria.



Supporting Documentssave_alt BMH-028332 - RESEARCH ASSOCIATE FPs(PDF,122KB)

 

Link : https://www.jobs.manchester.ac.uk/Job/JobDetail?JobId=31873

vendredi 4 avril 2025

Contagion et contamination au XIXe siècle

Contagion and Contamination in the Nineteenth Century
 

Free and Online One-Day Interdisciplinary Workshop
 

Thursday 1 May, 9.00am – 5.00pm (Central European Time)
Registration is required. Sign-up here.

The Centre for Nineteenth-Century Studies International (CNCSI) is pleased to announce a free and online one-day interdisciplinary workshop exploring the relationship between contagion and contamination in nineteenth-century culture across the globe. The workshop will feature several emerging and established scholars as they interrogate a range of artistic renderings, literary representations, and historical case studies concerning contagious diseases, infection, and pollution in order to explore how ecological and epidemiological concerns of the present were first galvanised by the nineteenth-century anxieties of our recent past.

As the nineteenth century drew to a close, Hungarian physician and social critic Max Nordau warned that society had become ravaged by a severe epidemic: an infectious pandemic of cultural and moral decline. In his infamous social critique Degeneration (1892), Nordau declared: ‘We stand now in the midst of a severe mental epidemic; of a sort of black death of degeneration and hysteria, and it is natural that we should ask anxiously on all sides: “What is to come next?”’. Fears of this ‘severe mental epidemic’ were entwined with anxieties popularised by criminologists like Cesare Lombroso who speculated on the dormancy of an individual’s criminal disposition. Anxieties around moral contagion were further exacerbated by the popular press, political fiction, and satirical art which amplified the ever-expanding threat of social degeneracy.

Nineteenth-century cultural fears accompanied the pervasive, mediatised, and very real pathogenic threats to the bodies of late nineteenth-century individuals who faced epidemics of influenza, cholera, smallpox, the bubonic plague, scarlet fever, and venereal diseases on a global scale. On the other hand, the century also saw the transformation of medical responses to disease detection, prevention, and management. This included the cholera and sanitation investigations of John Snow in the 1850s, the pasteurisation and vaccination breakthroughs of Louis Pasteur, and the advent of antiseptic surgery through the work of Joseph Lister. As such, the nineteenth century was a time of invisible threat, seismic change, and vibrant discourse concerning diseases both real and imagined.

 

Please note all times are Central European Time (CET).


9:50-10:00 (CET): WELCOME ADDRESS


10:00-10:45 (CET): SESSION 1

Chair: Dr Madeline Potter, University of Edinburgh

Speaker: Dr Melissa Dickson, University of Queensland

Title: ‘The Nineteenth Century up-to-date with a Vengeance’: Spreading Vampirism and Russian Influenza across Bram Stoker’s Britain

The global influenza outbreak often referred to as the ‘Russian Flu’ began in the city of Petropavovsk in 1889 before sweeping with remarkable rapidity across Europe, the British Isles, and the United States. It is often cited as the first modern pandemic, moving as it did via major roads, rivers, and, notably, railway lines, many of which had not existed during the last major pandemic in the 1840s. As people were now more mobile, so too were their diseases. Commentators of the period noted that those who worked in crowded offices, and those who travelled together on modern public transport systems were most likely to contract the new strain of influenza. Press reports began to fuel public suspicion that the mail system was operating as a vector of transmission, as claims spread that railway employees and postal workers were often the first infected in their communities. Modern Britain, it seemed, was peculiarly vulnerable to infection, via the very technologies and the infrastructure by which it so often marked itself as modern.

This paper focuses on the palpable uneasiness that emerges in the British popular and medical press in response to the arrival of the Russian Flu in the United Kingdom. That response, I suggest, was driven in part by an anxiety that the weakness of the modern British subject and the vulnerabilities of its communication and transport networks had been exposed. I trace fears of invasion and contagion from overseas across British periodical culture, as well as within the Gothic mode of fiction, which played and preyed upon similar anxieties. Taking Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897) as my main fictional case study, I demonstrate the ways in which vampirism is imagined as a form of infection, which enters England by exploiting the very networks and technologies of empire that were used to assert its dominance: the communication, transportation and shipping routes that allow Jonathan Harker to visit Transylvania, also provide the very means by which a foreign body can enter and attack the heart of the British Empire. Re-contextualising the spread of vampirism throughout the population of Britain as a form of pandemic, I argue that Stoker’s novel served as a vehicle for anxieties about foreign invasion on a microbial scale.



11:00-11:45 (CET): SESSION 2

Chair: Professor Claudia Capancioni, Bishop Grosseteste University

Speaker: Timothy Mills, University of Portsmouth

Title: Implausible Deniability: Exploring the intersection of science, politics and public health in the British imperial response to contagion, contamination and the germ theory in late nineteenth-century India

As imperialism and globalisation exploded in the late nineteenth century, extractive commercial ventures and aggressive geopolitics meant that India became the perfect microbial petri dish for highly influential disease ecologies and the evolution of catastrophic pathogenic events. Despite the enormous scientific advances that characterised ‘The Wonderful Century’, British doctors and officials refused to accept the growing body of thought that tropical diseases were spread by germs and not through humoral imbalances or miasma.

The study of contagion and contamination in nineteenth-century Imperial India reveals arguments over the origins, causation and transmission of disease, yielding stories of nationalism, denialism, fatalism, blame, hygiene theatrics, bigotry, political opportunism, and commercial profiteering. Similar themes have emerged through the recent AIDS crisis and the way COVID-19 was understood, interpreted and treated. I will consider how and why the legacy of this resistance is still seen today through the way medicine was used to create racial and social disparity at this critical time in World history.

This paper will consider why such a highly developed international powerhouse as the British Empire refused to accept proven laboratory findings and highly persuasive public health policies proffered by modern science and widely discussed at International Sanitary Conferences.



11:45-13:00 (CET): LUNCH BREAK



13:00-13:45 (CET): SESSION 3

Chair: Dr Emily Vincent, University of Birmingham and Durham University

Speaker: Dr Amanda Sciampacone, The Open University

Title: Constructing Cholera’s Landscape: Nineteenth-Century Medical Climatology and the Colonial Picturesque

My paper will explore how epidemic cholera came to be racialised as an Indian disease seemingly born of an Indian environment. More than most illnesses of the period, cholera inspired deep fears in British society because of its apparent origins, the mysterious nature of its spread, and the symptoms it produced on the European body. Although cholera was known in Britain prior to the nineteenth century, British medics claimed that the epidemic form of the disease had emerged in 1817 in the town of Jessore in what they described as the putrid jungles of the Ganges Delta. Due to its apparent origin in India, British medics used the terms ‘Asiatic cholera’ and ‘Indian cholera’ to describe the new disease. With cholera’s arrival, British medics were confronted with a disease of which they had little knowledge. In attempting to identify its cause, they turned to an exploration of the environmental conditions in which it appeared to spread. Images were used to give visual form to these investigations. As I will argue, illustrations of cholera’s and India’s environment revealed how the disease took shape in the British imagination as an Indian entity; however, with subsequent outbreaks of cholera in Britain in 1848-49, 1853-54, and 1866, these images also implied an uncomfortable affinity between the climates of the metropole and the subcontinent.



14:00-14:45 (CET): SESSION 4

Chair: Dr Emma Merkling, University of Manchester and Durham University

Speaker: Dr Mark Frost, University of Portsmouth

Title: ‘No clearer or diviner waters’: Contamination, Abjection, and Ecocrisis in the Victorian Imagination

This paper will explore the mutual insinuations of water and the human body from ecocritical perspectives to suggest that as Victorians confronted environmental and sanitary crises, the hitherto-concealed extent of human involvement in environmental networks, and a new understanding of humans as aqueous symbiotic organisms, began to emerge. Examining literary works, lectures, and journalism by Charles Kingsley, Henry Mayhew, John Ruskin, and others, I trace figures of fluid circulation that disclose shifting attitudes to the always cultural relationship between humanity and environment. After mid-century, nascent ecological thinking was implicated in related crises of identity that were particularly felt at the vulnerable thresholds of human bodies and of water, revealing them as interconnected, blurring, and complicit ecological agents within dangerously-open environmental networks. Gradually-developing knowledge of microscopic organisms, and, as the century progressed, their role in disease transmission, threatened the purity, sovereignty, and closed status of the human body, while effecting a similar crisis in water’s associations with purity and healing. This paper will draw attention to the practical and symbolic connections between human bodies and watercourses during the period – by the passage of river water into drinking supplies and thence into the human body, and by the passage of human waste and pollution into rivers; but also in the way that both human and watery bodies are revealed as open, vulnerable circulatory systems composed of multiple agents and ingredients. In tracing how and why water and humanity became inextricably-connected agents-in-crisis within newly-understood ecological networks, I will outline the ways that watery bodies are open to the entry of multiple sources of contamination; and that it becomes impossible to demarcate boundaries between water and its pollution. Demonstrating that the indetermination of boundaries inherent in acts of water pollution was particularly troubling to Victorian commentators makes it possible to then show that these anxieties also haunted discourse about human bodies by revealing that human bodies, like rivers, are vulnerable, open networks, neither pure nor singular, but symbiotic and multiple.



15:00-15:45 (CET): SESSION 5

Chair: Professor Kirsten E. Shepherd, University of Oxford

Speaker: Professor Priscilla Wald, Duke University

Title: A Germ’s-Eye View: Getting Up Close and Personal with Our Microbes

In a 2000 article in Science, the Nobel Prize-winning microbiologist Joshua Lederberg predicted an upswing in pandemics in the coming century that “likely [would] unfold as episodes of a suspense thriller that could be titled Our Wits Versus Their Genes.” More surprising was his nomination of “the most sophisticated” and among “the most important” changes we could make: to replace the twentieth-century metaphor of war to describe humans’ relationship to our microbes with “a more ecologically informed metaphor, which includes the germs’-eye view of infection.” This talk comes out of Lederberg’s provocation.

In 1805 Alexander von Humboldt’s Essay on the Geography of Plants introduced the concept of the interdependence of life forms. The idea gathered force in the succeeding decades, emerging as a central insight of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species before it was christened “ecology” (Oecologia) in 1866 by the German zoologist Ernst Haeckel. The concept drew out an idea that had long been lying dormant in the theory of contagion. This talk will track the evolving understanding of interdependence through the rise of germ theory, the concept of the healthy human carrier, and the beginning of the public health movement. I am interested specifically, however, in how, why, and when medical science adopted the metaphor of “microbial warfare” to describe humanity’s relationship to our microbes and what we might gain in following Lederberg’s suggestion.


16:00-16:45 (CET): SESSION 6

Chair: Joanna Norman, Victoria and Albert Museum

Speaker: Dr Katherine Ott, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution

Title: The Lingering Nineteenth-Century, a Museum Exhibition, and a Curator

This talk is a discussion of an exhibition that examines the nineteenth-century origins of four values in current healthcare practices in the U.S. The exhibition, scheduled to open in early April 2025 at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History, is entitled First Do No Harm/Lo primero es no hacer daño. The content was conceived as a way to use history to make the COVID pandemic more comprehensible. Consequently, the team selected issues that COVID dramatically and seemingly suddenly exacerbated. The two main take-away ideas of the exhibition are that the processes of health and medicine are a paradox of wonderful, miraculous things along with harm and inequality and secondly, to understand health, it is necessary to use a One Health approach that considers humans, non-humans, and ecology. The lead curator for the exhibition will talk about the intricacies of presenting the legacy of scapegoating (during a Chinatown epidemic), colonialism (the rationale for high morbidity and mortality among Indigenous people), racism (embedded with Plantation doctors), and misogyny (the limited way in which women’s health was understood) to museum audiences in our complicated times.



16:45-17:00 (CET): CLOSING REMARKS

Speaker: Dr Emily Vincent, University of Birmingham and Durham University

jeudi 3 avril 2025

Les médicaments dans le monde médiévale

Curious Cures: Medicine in the Medieval World


Exhibition


A new exhibition on medieval medicine opens at Cambridge University Library on Saturday 29 March:

Inspired by a Wellcome-funded digitisation, cataloguing and conservation project, Curious Cures shows what medieval people thought about the body and how it functioned, how they sought to understand disease and its causes, and how they tried to treat a bewildering array of ailments and illnesses. Drawing on the collections of Cambridge University Library, as well as manuscripts loaned from several college libraries and the Bodleian Library in Oxford, Curious Cures explores how medieval physicians operated within international networks of knowledge and study, and drew on an ancient and multicultural intellectual heritage. It details how they built on this through further refinements and writings, as well as experiential learning and treatments that they knew (or thought they knew) to be effective. The provenance and contents of the manuscripts furthermore reveal the wide range of constituencies involved in the practice of medicine: not only educated physicians, but also members of the religious orders, surgeons, barbers, practitioners of the healing arts, and men and women in their own households. By providing translations of many of the recipes shown in the openings on display, the exhibition shares with visitors the experience of reading the words, seeing the writer's hand before our eyes, and entering - if for a brief moment - their mind and their world.


Entry is free. For opening hours, and to book a free ticket, go to: https://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/exhibitioncuriouscures


The exhibition runs until 6 December 2025.

mercredi 2 avril 2025

Décoloniser l'histoire de la santé publique

Decolonising Public Health in History


Roundtable


A Panel and Roundtable Connecting Premodern History to Issues in Public Health Today, as part of Global Public Health Week 2025.

When:
9 April, 9am Melbourne local time (GMT+10)
8 April, 6pm Chicago local time (GMT-5)

Where:
Zoom, online

Speakers:

Guy Geltner (Monash University): Social and Environmental Historian, currently researching the public health practices of miners, and their management of the environment, in southern Italy, 1100-1550.

Shireen Hamza (Northwestern University): Historian of Science and Technology in the Islamic World, currently researching the role of the ulema (Muslim scholars) in group prophylaxis and the history of public bathing.

Aydogan Kars (Monash University): Islam intellectual historian, currently researching prophylactic theory and practice in Muslim legal, mystical, and travel texts for religious travelers between 1200-1500.

Registration Form here.

Event Description:

Public health practitioners and researchers increasingly recognise the environment and climate health as integral to the public health of communities. We are tasked with finding sustainable, resilient health systems for an uncertain climate future and changing world, and investigating the multiple ways that “public health” can be practiced. One key part of this process is in the decolonisation of public health, which includes addressing historical and systemic inequities in public health, recognising diverse cultural and social contexts, and building a fairer, healthier future – for all. These are the focus of the Global Public Health Week 2025. Decolonisation is a path forward that could address colonial inequities, but it depends on honest reckonings with the past.

Public health is commonly understood as a modern phenomenon. However, communities all over the world practiced public health in their own ways, with various ingenuities and multiple viewpoints, for hundreds of years. What public health practices have been lost to us over time? Could communities consider harnessing them as resources or inspiration today? Decolonising public health is not just about understanding the impacts of colonisation and systemic inequities now. It is also about understanding the way that the framework of “public health” was constructed in the first place, influenced by colonialism and Eurocentrism.

In this Panel Discussion/ Roundtable, historians Guy Geltner, Shireen Hamza, and Aydogan Kars, share the implications and insights of their work into public health attitudes and practices leading as far back as the 12th century. Their work spans South Asia, the Middle East, and Europe and explores the ways in which “public health” was managed by people. They discuss how public health included practices that we might today take for granted or not immediately recognise as public health – like the importance of water and the environment to bodily constitutions, the dissemination of materials to the public, the entanglement of spiritual and physical health practices, and various prophylactics – preventative methods – to ward off illness. Importantly, their research highlights how public health in history included the integral relationships between environmental health and human health, and between religion and public health dissemination. This panel hopes to highlight to all contemporary practitioners the importance of looking to history – by six hundred years or more – in pursuing public health innovations, and in decolonising its processes.

This Roundtable is an exciting opportunity during GPHW to connect public health practitioners with public health historians, to “Decolonise Public Health for a Healthier World”.

This event is organised by the ARC Discovery Project research project “Pursuing Public Health in the Preindustrial World, 1100-1800” and generously funded by the ARC.

For questions or more information, please contact Sarah May: sarahmay.comley@monash.edu

mardi 1 avril 2025

Les débuts de l’endoscopie

Les débuts de l’endoscopie

Roger Teyssou
 

L'Harmattan
Date de publication : 27/03/2025
Collection : Acteurs de la Science


Cinq noms marquent les débuts de l’endoscopie : Philipp Bozzini (1773-1809), inventeur du Lichtleiter en 1806, Pierre Ségalas (1792-1875), qui présente un cystoscope en 1827, Jean-Pierre Bonnafont (1805-1891) qui construit un otoscope dès 1860 et enfin Antonin Jean Desormeaux (1815-1894) qui fait paraître en 1865 le premier traité d’Endoscopie. La même année, Francis Richard Cruise (1834-1912) publie The Endoscope.
On mesure le progrès accompli entre la publication en 1935 du Traité de gastroscopie de François Moutier (1881-1961) qui utilisait le gastroscope de Wolf-Schindler et l’apparition en 1987 du premier fibroscope conçu par Basil Hirschcowitz (1925-2013) qui cédera la place aux composants optoélectroniques, le terme de fibroscope devant être abandonné.

lundi 31 mars 2025

2 500 ans de lutte pour l’avortement

Pushback: The 2,500-Year Fight to Thwart Women by Restricting Abortion
 


Mary Fissell 



Publisher ‏ : ‎ Seal Press (March 11, 2025)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 288 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1541604075
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1541604070


The long history of how restricting access to abortion has been used to curtail women’s advancement

Attitudes about abortion cycle between long periods of widespread tolerance, to repression, and back again. What accounts for these pendulum swings? From ancient Greece to the modern West, historian of medicine Mary Fissell argues, abortion repression springs up in response to men’s anxieties about women’s increasing independence.

In Pushback, Fissell shows that, across centuries and continents, abortion has always been commonplace, and persecuting women for ending pregnancies has been about controlling their behavior. As Protestantism de-emphasized celibacy, new abortion restrictions policed unmarried women’s sex lives. Nineteenth-century men unsettled by first-wave feminism hoped to establish medicine as a male profession, and so advocated for abortion bans to undercut women’s new roles as physicians. Fissell presents this history through the hidden stories of women committed to reproductive self-determination: holy women of the early Catholic Church whose ability to end pregnancies was considered miraculous, midwives accused of witchcraft or criminal conspiracy, and everyday women whose pregnancies threatened their livelihoods—and their lives.

Pushback is essential reading for understanding the complex history of abortion and making sense of recent crackdowns on reproductive rights.

dimanche 30 mars 2025

Histoire de l'examen pelvien

“Do I need to take a security guard to the gynecologist?” Sexual Misconduct and the Crisis in Reproductive Health Care in the U.S.



Talk by Dr. Wendy Kline 


Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2025, 4:00pm - 5:00pm, ET
Speaker: Wendy Kline, PhD, Purdue University

Why has the pelvic exam become a source of shame and fear? In this hybrid Bates Center seminar, Dr. Wendy Kline argues that the real problem has to do with the unaddressed, indeed silenced, stigma surrounding the practice of the routine gynecological exam.

Click to register for this event: https://www.nursing.upenn.edu/calendar/event/5097-do-i-need-to-take-a-security-guard-to-the-gynecologist-.


Abstract: Beginning in 1960, a trip to the gynecologist was nearly synonymous with getting the birth control pill – or at least the main reason many visited the gynecologist in the U.S. But by the 1990s, it was becoming clearer that more and more sexually active women were putting off a trip to the gynecologist due to the shame and fear of getting a pelvic exam. But why has the pelvic exam become a source of shame and fear? The exposure of sexual misconduct in the examining room has eroded the sense of trust between patients and gynecologists, resulting in a massive decline in preventive reproductive health care. In this talk, Kline argues that the real problem has to do with the unaddressed, indeed silenced, stigma surrounding the practice of the routine gynecological exam. It has to do with the very uncomfortable question of what it means to touch and peer into the vagina of a patient. And it’s a problem that’s been with us since the origins of gynecology.

Bio: Wendy Kline, Ph.D., Dema G. Seelye Chair in the History of Medicine at Purdue University, is internationally recognized for her scholarship in the history of medicine, history of women’s health and the history of childbirth. She is the author of four major books focusing on sexuality and reproduction: Exposed: The Hidden History of the Pelvic Exam (Polity Press, 2024); Coming Home: How Midwives Changed Birth (Oxford University Press, 2019); Bodies of Knowledge: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Women’s Health in the Second Wave (U. of Chicago Press 2010); and Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom (U. of California Press, 2001). She has appeared in the Netflix documentry, Sex, Explained, as well as the PBS documentary, The Eugenics Crusade. Her research has been funded by major fellowships, including a Fulbright Distinguished Scholar fellowship, a British Academy Fellowship, and a Huntington Fellowship. Kline is also a professional violinist, currently principal second with the Lafayette Symphony Orchestra.

Contact Email
nhistory@nursing.upenn.edu

samedi 29 mars 2025

Les soins infirmiers en prison

Prison Nursing Unlocked

Exhibition Launch

24 April 2025, 5 – 8pm (talks 6pm)

RCN, 20 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0RN and online from 6pm

Free, book online here: https://www.rcn.org.uk/news-and-events/events/prison-nursing-exhibition-launch


Join us for the launch of a new exhibition on the history of prison nursing, from the early nineteenth century to the present day.

The launch event will include a panel discussion on the past, present and future of prison health, drop-in activities and a chance to view the exhibition. Refreshments will be provided.


Speakers include: Donna Goddard, Ann Norman, Sobanan Naranthiren and Liz Walsh.