The Establishment of Genetic Counseling
in the Second Half of the 20th Century
Call for applications
International Workshop
Berlin, February 2-3, 2016
Deadline: May 17, 2015
The rapid development of molecular genetics in the 1950s
not only led to the establishment of human genetics as a separate discipline,
it also fundamentally changed the thinking about disease and health. Genetics
became indispensable for studying the causation, formation, and development of
diseases. Yet, because of the low potential for an actual cure of genetic
diseases, genetic counseling received special significance as "the most
immediate and practical service that genetics can render in medicine and surgery,”
according to the WHO Expert Committee on Human Genetics in 1964. Genetic
counseling centers were set up throughout the world, although unevenly
distributed. The reasons for why people sought counseling varied considerably –
from evaluating the risk of having a child with Down’s Syndrome to detecting
the sickle cell gene.
The aim of the workshop is to bring together researchers
in the history of medicine or science, in disability studies, cultural
anthropology and other related fields in order to analyze global, national, and
local factors that influenced the establishment of genetic counseling and
shaped its further development. Both explorations of the concrete
implementation of genetic counseling and examinations of its effects on society
are of interest. We welcome lectures on particular countries, institutions, and
persons as well as comprehensive topics, such as the entanglement of laboratory
practices and genetic counseling, or the relationship of the women’s rights
movement(s) and genetic counseling.
The following questions could be addressed:
• How did
genetic counseling become established in countries of the “First,”
“Second,” or
“Third World,” and against the backdrop of the Cold War and
North-South
conflict?
• What was the
role of national and international scientific networks at the
time?
• How was
genetic counseling integrated into particular health care systems?
• Which
traditions in genetic counseling did human geneticists follow? From
which did they
distance themselves, in particular in regards to National
Socialism?
• What did the
practice of genetic counseling look like?
• Which
strategies were deployed to popularize it?
• Was there
criticism of and/or protest against genetic counseling, and which
were the
driving forces?
The conference language will be English. The organizer
plans a publication of the contributions. Participants are invited to send
their abstracts of up to 500 words and a short CV to susanne.doetz@charite.de by May 17,
2015
Provided that funding can be secured for the workshop,
travel and accommodation will be covered.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire